Aggregating NVD, CVE, and multi-source threat feeds, this list provides deep analysis of high-risk threats such as RCE. By integrating CVSS and EPSS models, the system dynamically tracks Exp (Exploit) resources and PoC availability to accurately assess Exploitability. Combined with official Patches and remediation strategies, it helps prioritize Vulnerability Management workflows, significantly shortening response cycles and securing your critical assets.
| CVE | Description | Max CVSS | EPSS % | Published | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2007-2841 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3947. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-3947. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3947 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | N/A | 0.24% | 2019-11-05 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-0899 | There is a possible heap overflow in libclamav/fsg.c before 0.100.0. | 9.8 | 1.53% | 2019-11-05 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2007-6763 | SAS Drug Development (SDD) before 32DRG02 mishandles logout actions, which allows a user (who was previously logged in) to access resources by pressing a back or forward button in a web browser. | 8.8 | 1.32% | 2019-07-31 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2007-6762 | In the Linux kernel before 2.6.20, there is an off-by-one bug in net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c where it is possible to overflow the doi_def->tags[] array. | 9.8 | 2.98% | 2019-07-27 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2007-1348 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2018-02-23 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-5341 | Remote code execution in the Venkman script debugger in Mozilla Firefox before 2.0.0.8. | 9.8 | 2.99% | 2017-08-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2007-5199 | A single byte overflow in catalogue.c in X.Org libXfont 1.3.1 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact. | 9.8 | 2.21% | 2017-08-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2007-6256 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-6247 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-5357 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-5356 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-5354 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-5353 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-5349 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-5346 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-5345 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-5343 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-3904 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-3900 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-3894 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |