Aggregating NVD, CVE, and multi-source threat feeds, this list provides deep analysis of high-risk threats such as RCE. By integrating CVSS and EPSS models, the system dynamically tracks Exp (Exploit) resources and PoC availability to accurately assess Exploitability. Combined with official Patches and remediation strategies, it helps prioritize Vulnerability Management workflows, significantly shortening response cycles and securing your critical assets.
| CVE | Description | Max CVSS | EPSS % | Published | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2008-7307 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2020-11-05 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2008-7306 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2020-11-05 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2008-7305 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2020-11-05 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2008-7304 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2020-11-05 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2008-3793 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3792. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3792. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3792 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | N/A | 0.24% | 2020-02-07 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2008-7314 | mIRC before 6.35 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long nickname. | 7.5 | 1.35% | 2020-01-23 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2008-7273 | A symlink issue exists in Iceweasel-firegpg before 0.6 due to insecure tempfile handling. | 7.8 | 0.40% | 2019-11-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2008-7291 | gri before 2.12.18 generates temporary files in an insecure way. | 9.8 | 1.42% | 2019-11-07 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2008-7272 | FireGPG before 0.6 handle user’s passphrase and decrypted cleartext insecurely by writing pre-encrypted cleartext and the user's passphrase to disk which may result in the compromise of secure communication or a users’s private key. | 7.5 | 0.89% | 2019-11-07 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2008-5083 | In JON 2.1.x before 2.1.2 SP1, users can obtain unauthorized security information about private resources managed by JBoss ON. | 6.5 | 0.87% | 2019-11-07 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2008-3278 | frysk packages through 2008-08-05 as shipped in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 are built with an insecure RPATH set in the ELF header of multiple binaries in /usr/bin/f* (e.g. fcore, fcatch, fstack, fstep, ...) shipped in the package. A local attacker can exploit this vulnerability by running arbitrary code as another user. | 7.8 | 0.35% | 2019-11-07 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2008-7321 | The tubepress plugin before 1.6.5 for WordPress has XSS. | 6.1 | 0.92% | 2019-08-22 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2008-7320 | GNOME Seahorse through 3.30 allows physically proximate attackers to read plaintext passwords by using the quickAllow dialog at an unattended workstation, if the keyring is unlocked. NOTE: this is disputed by a software maintainer because the behavior represents a design decision | 6.8 | 0.45% | 2018-11-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2008-7319 | The Net::Ping::External extension through 0.15 for Perl does not properly sanitize arguments (e.g., invalid hostnames) containing shell metacharacters before use of backticks in External.pm, allowing for shell command injection and arbitrary command execution if untrusted input is used. | 9.8 | 6.19% | 2017-11-07 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2008-7315 | UI-Dialog 1.09 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands. | 9.8 | 3.43% | 2017-10-10 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2008-1422 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1419. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-1419. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1419 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-08-10 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2008-1421 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-08-10 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2008-5485 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2008-5484 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2008-5483 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |