Aggregating NVD, CVE, and multi-source threat feeds, this list provides deep analysis of high-risk threats such as RCE. By integrating CVSS and EPSS models, the system dynamically tracks Exp (Exploit) resources and PoC availability to accurately assess Exploitability. Combined with official Patches and remediation strategies, it helps prioritize Vulnerability Management workflows, significantly shortening response cycles and securing your critical assets.
Assigner (CNA / source)：[email protected] Remove this filter
| CVE | Description | Max CVSS | EPSS % | Published | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-62813 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | N/A | 0.01% | 2025-10-23 | 2025-10-29 |
| CVE-2025-70420 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | N/A | 0.01% | 2026-04-21 | 2026-06-10 |
| CVE-2025-32883 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-41722. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2024-41722. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-41722. instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | N/A | 0.01% | 2025-05-01 | 2025-05-09 |
| CVE-2025-29479 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | N/A | 0.02% | 2025-04-07 | 2025-04-12 |
| CVE-2025-28253 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was issued in error. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | N/A | 0.02% | 2025-03-27 | 2025-04-07 |
| CVE-2026-23766 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | N/A | 0.02% | 2026-01-15 | 2026-02-14 |
| CVE-2025-61081 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | N/A | 0.02% | 2026-05-19 | 2026-06-01 |
| CVE-2025-45080 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | N/A | 0.03% | 2025-07-01 | 2025-07-10 |
| CVE-2025-29630 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue; there is no indication that an applicable SSH private key has ever been compromised. Notes: none. | N/A | 0.04% | 2025-07-25 | 2026-04-03 |
| CVE-2023-51204 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. | N/A | 0.04% | 2024-01-30 | 2024-05-26 |
| CVE-2023-51197 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. | N/A | 0.04% | 2024-01-30 | 2024-05-26 |
| CVE-2023-33567 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. | N/A | 0.04% | 2023-06-27 | 2024-05-26 |
| CVE-2023-26812 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-26813. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2023-26813. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2023-26813 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | N/A | 0.04% | 2023-04-28 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2022-36757 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | N/A | 0.04% | 2022-09-06 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2021-46443 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | N/A | 0.04% | 2022-04-01 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2021-46439 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation sho | N/A | 0.04% | 2022-03-31 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2020-23066 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. Consult IDs: CVE-2020-17480. Reason: This CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2020-17480. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-17480 instead of this record. | N/A | 0.04% | 2023-06-26 | 2024-05-14 |
| CVE-2007-5908 | Rejected reason: Buffer overflow in the (1) sysfs_show_available_clocksources and (2) sysfs_show_current_clocksources functions in Linux kernel 2.6.23 and earlier might allow local users to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via crafted clock source names. NOTE: follow-on analysis by Linux developers states that "There is no way for unprivileged users (or really even the root user) to add new clocksources. | N/A | 0.04% | 2007-11-09 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2007-2056 | Rejected reason: The getlock function in aimage/aimage.cpp in AFFLIB 2.2.8 and earlier allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on temporary lock files (aka "time-of-check-time-of-use file race"). NOTE: the researcher has retracted the original advisory, stating that "the portion of vulnerable code is not called in any current version of AFFLIB and is therefore not exploitable. | N/A | 0.04% | 2007-04-30 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-1999-0335 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-0032. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-0032. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-0032 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | N/A | 0.04% | 1996-08-01 | 2023-11-06 |