Aggregating NVD, CVE, and multi-source threat feeds, this list provides deep analysis of high-risk threats such as RCE. By integrating CVSS and EPSS models, the system dynamically tracks Exp (Exploit) resources and PoC availability to accurately assess Exploitability. Combined with official Patches and remediation strategies, it helps prioritize Vulnerability Management workflows, significantly shortening response cycles and securing your critical assets.
Assigner (CNA / source)：[email protected] Remove this filter
| CVE | Description | Max CVSS | EPSS % | Published | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-48560 | In AndroidManifest.xml, there is a possible way for an app to monitor motion events due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 5.5 | 0.07% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48559 | In multiple functions of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible add a large amount of app ops due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 5.5 | 0.08% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48558 | In multiple functions of BatteryService.java, there is a possible way to hijack implicit intent intended for system app due to Implicit intent hijacking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.08% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48556 | In multiple methods of NotificationChannel.java, there is a possible desynchronization from persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | 7.3 | 0.08% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48554 | In handlePackagesChanged of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | 6.1 | 0.08% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48553 | In handlePackagesChanged of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible DoS of a device admin due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.09% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48552 | In saveGlobalProxyLocked of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible way to desync from persistence due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.10% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48551 | In multiple locations, there is a possible leak of an image across the Android User isolation boundary due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | 5.0 | 0.07% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48550 | In testGrantSlicePermission of SliceManagerTest.java, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to a path traversal error. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 5.5 | 0.09% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48549 | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to record audio via a background app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.11% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48548 | In multiple functions of AppOpsControllerImpl.java, there is a possible way to record audio without displaying the privacy indicator due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | 7.3 | 0.10% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48547 | In multiple locations, there is a possible one-time permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | 7.3 | 0.08% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48546 | In checkPermissions of SafeActivityOptions.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.09% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48545 | In isSystemUid of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible way for an app to access privileged APIs due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local privilege escalation with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.1 | 0.09% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48544 | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to read files belonging to other apps due to SQL injection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.10% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48543 KEV | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to escape chrome sandbox to attack android system_server due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 8.8 | 0.55% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48542 | In multiple functions of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 5.5 | 0.08% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48541 | In onCreate of FaceSettings.java, there is a possible way to remove biometric unlock across user profiles due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.08% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48540 | In processTransactInternal of RpcState.cpp, there is a possible local out of memory write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.09% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48539 | In SendPacketToPeer of acl_arbiter.cc, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a use after free. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 8.0 | 0.24% | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |