CVE-2012-0802

Multiple buffer overflows in Spamdyke before 4.3.0 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to "serious errors in the usage of snprintf()/vsnprintf()" in which the return values may be larger than the size of the buffer.

公开: 2012-06-19 最后更新: 2026-06-16 分配方: [email protected] 来源: [email protected]

结论预警: CVE-2012-0802 综合评估为中等风险(60.5/100):CVSS 技术影响为高级,利用概率偏高(EPSS 4.57%,百分位 90%) 核心证据: EPSS 显示该漏洞近期被利用的可能性处于高位。 强制指令: 被利用概率偏高—请排查暴露面并优先安排修补。

风险随态势动态变化;本站持续评估并同步更新本页展示内容。

CVE-2012-0802 的 EPSS(利用预测评分)

EPSS 日更估计相对被利用可能性;百分位表示该 CVE 在已评分漏洞中的相对排名(越高表示相对更严重)。

# 日期 旧 EPSS 分数 新 EPSS 分数 变化(新 − 旧)
1 2026-06-15 5.75% 4.57% -1.17%
2 2025-03-30 7.03% 5.75% -1.29%
3 2025-03-29 7.03%

完整 EPSS 历史 (共 17 条)

CVE-2012-0802 的 CVSS 指标

该 CVE 的 CVSS 指标。

底座分 版本 严重度 向量 可利用性 影响 分数来源
7.5 2.0 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P 点击展开
访问路径 (AV:N)
只要路由可达,即可从远端发起利用。
访问复杂度 (AC:L)
步骤短、路径清晰,复现成本低。
认证 (AU:N)
全程无需有效身份。
机密性影响 (C:P)
机密性受到部分损害。
完整性影响 (I:P)
完整性受到部分损害。
可用性影响 (A:P)
可用性受到部分损害。
10.0 6.4 [email protected]

CVE-2012-0802 的弱点枚举

CVE-2012-0802 的 OS 跟踪

vendor priority summary link
gentoo high CVE-2012-0802: 1 GLSA(s) (201203-01), 1 atom(s) (mail-filter/spamdyke); latest impact high. https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=CVE-2012-0802

CVE-2012-0802 的影响软件 / 配置

厂商 产品 版本 原始 CPE
spamdyke spamdyke <= 4.2.1 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 3.0.0 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:3.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 3.0.1 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:3.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 3.1.0 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:3.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 3.1.1 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:3.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 3.1.2 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:3.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 3.1.3 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:3.1.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 3.1.4 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:3.1.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 3.1.5 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:3.1.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 3.1.6 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:3.1.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 3.1.7 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:3.1.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 3.1.8 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:3.1.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.0 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.0 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.0:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.0 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.0:beta2:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.0 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.0:beta3:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.0 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.1 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.2 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.3 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.4 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.5 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.5 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.5:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.5 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.5:beta2:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.5 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.5:beta3:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.5 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.5:beta4:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.6 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.7 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.8 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.9 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.0.10 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.1.0 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
spamdyke spamdyke 4.2.0 cpe:2.3:a:spamdyke:spamdyke:4.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

CVE-2012-0802 的参考链接

cvelogic Threat Intelligence