汇总 abus 相关全部产品的 CVE 与安全漏洞情报，包括 CVSS、EPSS、公开时间与漏洞情报数据。
常见弱点模式包括 路径处理缺陷与缓冲区溢出，在 软件部署与生产负载 使用场景中可能带来 文件覆盖、应用崩溃与内存损坏 等风险。
相关漏洞数据主要来源于公开漏洞披露与安全公告，可用于评估历史漏洞暴露面与修复优先级。
| CVE | 摘要 | 来源 | 最高 CVSS | EPSS % | 公开时间 | 更新时间 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-17879 | An issue was discovered on certain ABUS TVIP cameras. The CGI scripts allow remote attackers to execute code via system() as root. There are several injection points in various scripts. | [email protected] | 9.8 | 62.19% | 2023-10-26 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2018-17878 | Buffer Overflow vulnerability in certain ABUS TVIP cameras allows attackers to gain control of the program via crafted string sent to sprintf() function. | [email protected] | 9.8 | 0.12% | 2023-10-26 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2018-17559 | Due to incorrect access control, unauthenticated remote attackers can view the /video.mjpg video stream of certain ABUS TVIP cameras. | [email protected] | 7.5 | 0.18% | 2023-10-26 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2018-17558 | Hardcoded manufacturer credentials and an OS command injection vulnerability in the /cgi-bin/mft/ directory on ABUS TVIP TVIP20050 LM.1.6.18, TVIP10051 LM.1.6.18, TVIP11050 MG.1.6.03.05, TVIP20550 LM.1.6.18, TVIP10050 LM.1.6.18, TVIP11550 MG.1.6.03, TVIP21050 MG.1.6.03, and TVIP51550 MG.1.6.03 cameras allow remote attackers to execute code as root. | [email protected] | 9.8 | 2.54% | 2023-10-26 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2018-16739 | An issue was discovered on certain ABUS TVIP devices. Due to a path traversal in /opt/cgi/admin/filewrite, an attacker can write to files, and thus execute code arbitrarily with root privileges. | [email protected] | 8.8 | 0.24% | 2023-10-26 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2023-26609 | ABUS TVIP 20000-21150 devices allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in the /cgi-bin/mft/wireless_mft ap field. | [email protected] | 7.2 | 36.78% | 2023-02-27 | 2025-05-05 |
| CVE-2020-28973 | The ABUS Secvest wireless alarm system FUAA50000 (v3.01.17) fails to properly authenticate some requests to its built-in HTTPS interface. Someone can use this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information from the system, such as usernames and passwords. This information can then be used to reconfigure or disable the alarm system. | [email protected] | 7.5 | 0.35% | 2021-04-21 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2020-14158 | The ABUS Secvest FUMO50110 hybrid module does not have any security mechanism that ensures confidentiality or integrity of RF packets that are exchanged with an alarm panel. This makes it easier to conduct wAppLoxx authentication-bypass attacks. | [email protected] | 9.1 | 0.37% | 2020-07-30 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2020-14157 | The wireless-communication feature of the ABUS Secvest FUBE50001 device does not encrypt sensitive data such as PIN codes or IDs of used proximity chip keys (RFID tokens). This makes it easier for an attacker to disarm the wireless alarm system. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 0.10% | 2020-06-17 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2019-14261 | An issue was discovered on ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 3.01.01 devices. Due to an insufficient implementation of jamming detection, an attacker is able to suppress correctly received RF messages sent between wireless peripheral components, e.g., wireless detectors or remote controls, and the ABUS Secvest alarm central. An attacker is able to perform a "reactive jamming" attack. The reactive jamming simply detects the start of a RF message sent by a component of the ABUS Secvest wireless alarm system, | [email protected] | 7.5 | 1.26% | 2019-09-03 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2019-9861 | Due to the use of an insecure RFID technology (MIFARE Classic), ABUS proximity chip keys (RFID tokens) of the ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 wireless alarm system can easily be cloned and used to deactivate the alarm system in an unauthorized way. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 0.21% | 2019-05-14 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2019-9860 | Due to unencrypted signal communication and predictability of rolling codes, an attacker can "desynchronize" an ABUS Secvest wireless remote control (FUBE50014 or FUBE50015) relative to its controlled Secvest wireless alarm system FUAA50000 3.01.01, so that sent commands by the remote control are not accepted anymore. | [email protected] | 7.5 | 0.16% | 2019-03-27 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2019-9863 | Due to the use of an insecure algorithm for rolling codes in the ABUS Secvest wireless alarm system FUAA50000 3.01.01 and its remote controls FUBE50014 and FUBE50015, an attacker is able to predict valid future rolling codes, and can thus remotely control the alarm system in an unauthorized way. | [email protected] | 9.8 | 0.80% | 2019-03-27 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2019-9862 | An issue was discovered on ABUS Secvest wireless alarm system FUAA50000 3.01.01 in conjunction with Secvest remote control FUBE50014 or FUBE50015. Because "encrypted signal transmission" is missing, an attacker is able to eavesdrop sensitive data as cleartext (for instance, the current rolling code state). | [email protected] | 6.5 | 0.09% | 2019-03-27 | 2024-11-21 |