freeradius 漏洞与 CVE 列表(48)

产品(CPE): — CVE 数: 48

freeradius 漏洞概览

汇总 freeradius 相关全部产品的 CVE 与安全漏洞情报,包括 CVSS、EPSS、公开时间与漏洞情报数据。

已披露问题常与 内存损坏、路径处理缺陷与输入验证问题 相关,可能在 生产负载与软件部署 场景中带来 内存损坏与文件覆盖 等暴露风险。

相关漏洞数据主要来源于公开漏洞披露与安全公告,可用于评估历史漏洞暴露面与修复优先级。

漏洞分布趋势(近 24 个月)

显示 12048 CVE 数
«« 第一页 « 上一页 第 1 / 3 页 下一页 »
CVE 摘要 来源 最高 CVSS EPSS % 公开时间 更新时间
CVE-2024-3596 RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature. [email protected] 9.0 14.86% 2024-07-09 2026-06-17
CVE-2022-41861 A flaw was found in freeradius. A malicious RADIUS client or home server can send a malformed abinary attribute which can cause the server to crash. [email protected] 6.5 1.10% 2023-01-17 2026-06-17
CVE-2022-41860 In freeradius, when an EAP-SIM supplicant sends an unknown SIM option, the server will try to look that option up in the internal dictionaries. This lookup will fail, but the SIM code will not check for that failure. Instead, it will dereference a NULL pointer, and cause the server to crash. [email protected] 7.5 1.17% 2023-01-17 2026-06-17
CVE-2022-41859 In freeradius, the EAP-PWD function compute_password_element() leaks information about the password which allows an attacker to substantially reduce the size of an offline dictionary attack. [email protected] 7.5 0.86% 2023-01-17 2026-06-17
CVE-2019-17185 In FreeRADIUS 3.0.x before 3.0.20, the EAP-pwd module used a global OpenSSL BN_CTX instance to handle all handshakes. This mean multiple threads use the same BN_CTX instance concurrently, resulting in crashes when concurrent EAP-pwd handshakes are initiated. This can be abused by an adversary as a Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack. [email protected] 7.5 2.17% 2020-03-20 2026-06-16
CVE-2015-9542 add_password in pam_radius_auth.c in pam_radius 1.4.0 does not correctly check the length of the input password, and is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow during memcpy(). An attacker could send a crafted password to an application (loading the pam_radius library) and crash it. Arbitrary code execution might be possible, depending on the application, C library, compiler, and other factors. [email protected] 7.5 3.54% 2020-02-24 2026-06-16
CVE-2019-13456 In FreeRADIUS 3.0 through 3.0.19, on average 1 in every 2048 EAP-pwd handshakes fails because the password element cannot be found within 10 iterations of the hunting and pecking loop. This leaks information that an attacker can use to recover the password of any user. This information leakage is similar to the "Dragonblood" attack and CVE-2019-9494. [email protected] 6.5 1.63% 2019-12-03 2026-06-16
CVE-2019-10143 It was discovered freeradius up to and including version 3.0.19 does not correctly configure logrotate, allowing a local attacker who already has control of the radiusd user to escalate his privileges to root, by tricking logrotate into writing a radiusd-writable file to a directory normally inaccessible by the radiusd user. NOTE: the upstream software maintainer has stated "there is simply no way for anyone to gain privileges through this alleged issue." [email protected] 7.0 0.35% 2019-05-24 2026-06-16
CVE-2019-11235 FreeRADIUS before 3.0.19 mishandles the "each participant verifies that the received scalar is within a range, and that the received group element is a valid point on the curve being used" protection mechanism, aka a "Dragonblood" issue, a similar issue to CVE-2019-9498 and CVE-2019-9499. [email protected] 9.8 3.57% 2019-04-22 2026-06-16
CVE-2019-11234 FreeRADIUS before 3.0.19 does not prevent use of reflection for authentication spoofing, aka a "Dragonblood" issue, a similar issue to CVE-2019-9497. [email protected] 9.8 7.62% 2019-04-22 2026-06-16
CVE-2017-10987 An FR-GV-304 issue in FreeRADIUS 3.x before 3.0.15 allows "DHCP - Buffer over-read in fr_dhcp_decode_suboptions()" and a denial of service. [email protected] 7.5 2.80% 2017-07-17 2026-06-16
CVE-2017-10986 An FR-GV-303 issue in FreeRADIUS 3.x before 3.0.15 allows "DHCP - Infinite read in dhcp_attr2vp()" and a denial of service. [email protected] 7.5 2.80% 2017-07-17 2026-06-16
CVE-2017-10985 An FR-GV-302 issue in FreeRADIUS 3.x before 3.0.15 allows "Infinite loop and memory exhaustion with 'concat' attributes" and a denial of service. [email protected] 7.5 3.06% 2017-07-17 2026-06-16
CVE-2017-10984 An FR-GV-301 issue in FreeRADIUS 3.x before 3.0.15 allows "Write overflow in data2vp_wimax()" - this allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code. [email protected] 9.8 6.07% 2017-07-17 2026-06-16
CVE-2017-10983 An FR-GV-206 issue in FreeRADIUS 2.x before 2.2.10 and 3.x before 3.0.15 allows "DHCP - Read overflow when decoding option 63" and a denial of service. [email protected] 7.5 3.35% 2017-07-17 2026-06-16
CVE-2017-10982 An FR-GV-205 issue in FreeRADIUS 2.x before 2.2.10 allows "DHCP - Buffer over-read in fr_dhcp_decode_options()" and a denial of service. [email protected] 7.5 3.60% 2017-07-17 2026-06-16
CVE-2017-10981 An FR-GV-204 issue in FreeRADIUS 2.x before 2.2.10 allows "DHCP - Memory leak in fr_dhcp_decode()" and a denial of service. [email protected] 7.5 3.37% 2017-07-17 2026-06-16
CVE-2017-10980 An FR-GV-203 issue in FreeRADIUS 2.x before 2.2.10 allows "DHCP - Memory leak in decode_tlv()" and a denial of service. [email protected] 7.5 3.37% 2017-07-17 2026-06-16
CVE-2017-10979 An FR-GV-202 issue in FreeRADIUS 2.x before 2.2.10 allows "Write overflow in rad_coalesce()" - this allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code. [email protected] 9.8 6.98% 2017-07-17 2026-06-16
CVE-2017-10978 An FR-GV-201 issue in FreeRADIUS 2.x before 2.2.10 and 3.x before 3.0.15 allows "Read / write overflow in make_secret()" and a denial of service. [email protected] 7.5 3.77% 2017-07-17 2026-06-16
«« 第一页 « 上一页 第 1 / 3 页 下一页 »
cvelogic Threat Intelligence