聚合 NVD、CVE 及多源情报，深度解析 RCE 等高危风险。系统集成 CVSS 与 EPSS 模型，动态追踪 Exploit 资源与 PoC 公开状态，研判可利用性。结合官方补丁与修复方案，优化漏洞管理优先级，缩短响应周期，保障资产安全。
分配机构（CNA / 来源）：[email protected] 移除此筛选
| CVE | 描述 | 最高 CVSS | EPSS % | 公开时间 | 更新时间 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-3558 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | 无 | 0.04% | 2022-03-10 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2021-40696 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | 无 | 0.04% | 2022-02-09 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2022-45148 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | 无 | 无 | 2023-01-12 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2024-0395 | Rejected reason: NON Security Issue. | 无 | 无 | 2024-01-10 | 2024-01-10 |
| CVE-2023-4533 | Rejected reason: Red Hat Product Security has come to the conclusion that this CVE is not needed. It was assigned as a duplicate of CVE-2023-52440 | 无 | 无 | 2025-04-30 | 2025-04-30 |
| CVE-2023-39177 | Rejected reason: Duplicate of CVE-2023-52442. | 无 | 无 | 2025-10-29 | 2025-10-29 |
| CVE-2023-39178 | Rejected reason: Duplicate of CVE-2023-52441. | 无 | 无 | 2025-10-29 | 2025-10-29 |
| CVE-2023-5092 | Rejected reason: This CVE id was assigned to an issue which was later deemed not security relevant. | 无 | 无 | 2025-12-23 | 2025-12-23 |
| CVE-2023-5093 | Rejected reason: This CVE id was assigned to an issue which was later deemed not security relevant. | 无 | 无 | 2025-12-23 | 2025-12-23 |
| CVE-2023-5094 | Rejected reason: This CVE id was assigned to an issue which was later deemed not security relevant. | 无 | 无 | 2025-12-23 | 2025-12-23 |
| CVE-2024-10398 | Rejected reason: This CVE id was assigned but later discarded. | 无 | 无 | 2025-12-23 | 2025-12-23 |
| CVE-2025-11249 | Rejected reason: This CVE id was assigned as a duplicate of CVE-2025-66414. | 无 | 无 | 2026-04-20 | 2026-04-20 |
| CVE-2017-1002150 | python-fedora 0.8.0 and lower is vulnerable to an open redirect resulting in loss of CSRF protection | 6.1 | 0.81% | 2017-09-14 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2017-1002151 | Pagure 3.3.0 and earlier is vulnerable to loss of confidentially due to improper authorization | 7.5 | 1.06% | 2017-09-14 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2017-1002152 | Bodhi 2.9.0 and lower is vulnerable to cross-site scripting resulting in code injection caused by incorrect validation of bug titles. | 6.1 | 0.78% | 2019-01-10 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2017-1002153 | Koji 1.13.0 does not properly validate SCM paths, allowing an attacker to work around blacklisted paths for build submission. | 7.5 | 1.14% | 2017-10-06 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2017-1002157 | modulemd 1.3.1 and earlier uses an unsafe function for processing externally provided data, leading to remote code execution. | 9.8 | 2.80% | 2019-01-10 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2018-1002150 | Koji version 1.12, 1.13, 1.14 and 1.15 contain an incorrect access control vulnerability resulting in arbitrary filesystem read/write access. This vulnerability has been fixed in versions 1.12.1, 1.13.1, 1.14.1 and 1.15.1. | 9.1 | 1.67% | 2018-04-04 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2020-15853 | supybot-fedora implements the command 'refresh', that refreshes the cache of all users from FAS. This takes quite a while to run, and zodbot stops responding to requests during this time. | 5.3 | 0.60% | 2022-10-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2020-15855 | Two cross-site scripting vulnerabilities were fixed in Bodhi 5.6.1. | 6.1 | 0.40% | 2022-10-07 | 2026-06-16 |