CVE-2011-1679

ncpfs 2.2.6 and earlier attempts to use (1) ncpmount to append to the /etc/mtab file and (2) ncpumount to append to the /etc/mtab.tmp file without first checking whether resource limits would interfere, which allows local users to trigger corruption of the /etc/mtab file via a process with a small RLIMIT_FSIZE value, a related issue to CVE-2011-1089.

公開： 2011-04-09 最後更新： 2026-06-16 指派方： [email protected] 來源： [email protected]
NVD 狀態：Modified，CVE 狀態： published
檢視： NVD, CVE.org, EUVD

CVE-2011-1679 綜合評估為低風險（23.6/100）：CVSS 技術影響為低級，利用機率偏低（EPSS 0.37%） 持續追蹤利用情報與 EPSS 變化，並適時複評優先級。

風險隨態勢動態變化；本站持續評估並同步更新本頁展示內容。

CVE-2011-1679 的 EPSS（利用預測評分）

EPSS 日更估計相對被利用可能性；百分位表示該 CVE 在已評分漏洞中的相對排名（越高表示相對更嚴重）。

# 日期 舊 EPSS 分數 新 EPSS 分數 變化（新 − 舊）
1 2026-06-15 0.08% 0.37% +0.29%
2 2025-03-17 0.04% 0.08% +0.03%
3 2023-03-07 — 0.04% —

完整 EPSS 歷史 （共 4 筆）

CVE-2011-1679 的 CVSS 指標

該 CVE 的 CVSS 指標。

底座分 版本 嚴重度 向量 可利用性 影響 分數來源
3.3 2.0 LOW
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N 點擊展開
存取路徑 (AV:L)
需本機登入或本機互動，僅遠端觸達不足以單獨完成利用。
存取複雜度 (AC:M)
需要若干有利條件，但不必「千年一遇」。
認證 (AU:N)
全程無需有效身分。
機密性影響 (C:P)
機密性受到部分損害。
完整性影響 (I:P)
完整性受到部分損害。
可用性影響 (A:N)
對可用性無影響。
 3.4 4.9 [email protected]

CVE-2011-1679 的弱點列舉

CVE-2011-1679 的 OS 追蹤

vendor priority summary link
ubuntu low CVE-2011-1679 low priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (ncpfs), 19 status rows across 19 suites (dapper, hardy, karmic, lucid, maverick, natty, oneiric, precise, quantal, raring, saucy, trusty, upstream, utopic, vivid, wily, xenial, yakkety, zesty): ignored 11, DNE 7, needs-triage 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2011-1679

CVE-2011-1679 的影響軟體 / 設定

廠商 產品 版本 原始 CPE
ncpfs ncpfs <= 2.2.6 cpe:2.3:a:ncpfs:ncpfs:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
ncpfs ncpfs 2.2.1 cpe:2.3:a:ncpfs:ncpfs:2.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
ncpfs ncpfs 2.2.2 cpe:2.3:a:ncpfs:ncpfs:2.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
ncpfs ncpfs 2.2.3 cpe:2.3:a:ncpfs:ncpfs:2.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
ncpfs ncpfs 2.2.4 cpe:2.3:a:ncpfs:ncpfs:2.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
ncpfs ncpfs 2.2.5 cpe:2.3:a:ncpfs:ncpfs:2.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

CVE-2011-1679 的參考連結

URL 標籤
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/10 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/11 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/12 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/9 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/05/3 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/05/7 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/07/9 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/16 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/5 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/7 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/15/6 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/22/4 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/22/6 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/3 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/4 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/04/01/2 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688980 Issue Tracking
https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66701
cvelogic Threat Intelligence