An issue was discovered in the IPv6 protocol specification, related to ICMP Packet Too Big (PTB) messages. (The scope of this CVE is all affected IPv6 implementations from all vendors.) The security implications of IP fragmentation have been discussed at length in [RFC6274] and [RFC7739]. An attacker can leverage the generation of IPv6 atomic fragments to trigger the use of fragmentation in an arbitrary IPv6 flow (in scenarios in which actual fragmentation of packets is not needed) and can subsequently perform any type of fragmentation-based attack against legacy IPv6 nodes that do not implement [RFC6946]. That is, employing fragmentation where not actually needed allows for fragmentation-based attack vectors to be employed, unnecessarily. We note that, unfortunately, even nodes that already implement [RFC6946] can be subject to DoS attacks as a result of the generation of IPv6 atomic fragments. Let us assume that Host A is communicating with Host B and that, as a result of the widespread dropping of IPv6 packets that contain extension headers (including fragmentation) [RFC7872], some intermediate node filters fragments between Host B and Host A. If an attacker sends a forged ICMPv6 PTB error message to Host B, reporting an MTU smaller than 1280, this will trigger the generation of IPv6 atomic fragments from that moment on (as required by [RFC2460]). When Host B starts sending IPv6 atomic fragments (in response to the received ICMPv6 PTB error message), these packets will be dropped, since we previously noted that IPv6 packets with extension headers were being dropped between Host B and Host A. Thus, this situation will result in a DoS scenario. Another possible scenario is that in which two BGP peers are employing IPv6 transport and they implement Access Control Lists (ACLs) to drop IPv6 fragments (to avoid control-plane attacks). If the aforementioned BGP peers drop IPv6 fragments but still honor received ICMPv6 PTB error messages, an attacker could easily attack the corresponding peering session by simply sending an ICMPv6 PTB message with a reported MTU smaller than 1280 bytes. Once the attack packet has been sent, the aforementioned routers will themselves be the ones dropping their own traffic.
結論預警: CVE-2016-10142 綜合評估為高風險(65.5/100):CVSS 技術影響為高級,利用機率(EPSS 2.73%) 核心證據: 近一日 EPSS 上升 +1.63%,被利用關注度持續升高。 強制指令: 被利用機率偏高—請盤點暴露面並優先安排修補。
風險隨態勢動態變化;本站持續評估並同步更新本頁展示內容。
EPSS 日更估計相對被利用可能性;百分位表示該 CVE 在已評分漏洞中的相對排名(越高表示相對更嚴重)。
| # | 日期 | 舊 EPSS 分數 | 新 EPSS 分數 | 變化(新 − 舊) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-06-15 | 1.10% | 2.73% | +1.63% |
| 2 | 2026-03-30 | 0.66% | 1.10% | +0.44% |
| 3 | 2025-03-30 | — | 0.66% | — |
完整 EPSS 歷史 (共 7 筆)
該 CVE 的 CVSS 指標。
| 底座分 | 版本 | 嚴重度 | 向量 | 可利用性 | 影響 | 分數來源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6 | 3.0 | HIGH |
|
3.9 | 4.0 | [email protected] |
| 5.0 | 2.0 | MEDIUM |
|
10.0 | 2.9 | [email protected] |
| vendor | priority | summary | link |
|---|---|---|---|
redhat
|
medium | — | https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-10142 |
suse
|
low | — | https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-10142/ |
ubuntu
|
medium | CVE-2016-10142 medium priority: Ubuntu including 99 source packages (linux, linux-armadaxp, …), 805 status rows across 12 suites (artful, bionic, focal, jammy, noble, plucky, precise, trusty, upstream, xenial, yakkety, zesty): DNE 535, not-affected 137, released 104, ignored 29. | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2016-10142 |