CVE-2016-7055

There is a carry propagating bug in the Broadwell-specific Montgomery multiplication procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0c that handles input lengths divisible by, but longer than 256 bits. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA, DSA and DH private keys are impossible. This is because the subroutine in question is not used in operations with the private key itself and an input of the attacker's direct choice. Otherwise the bug can manifest itself as transient authentication and key negotiation failures or reproducible erroneous outcome of public-key operations with specially crafted input. Among EC algorithms only Brainpool P-512 curves are affected and one presumably can attack ECDH key negotiation. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely. Namely multiple clients have to choose the curve in question and the server has to share the private key among them, neither of which is default behaviour. Even then only clients that chose the curve will be affected.

公開: 2017-05-04 最後更新: 2026-06-16 指派方: [email protected] 來源: [email protected]

結論預警: CVE-2016-7055 綜合評估為中等風險(57.1/100):CVSS 技術影響為中級,利用機率偏高(EPSS 14.22%,百分位 96%) 核心證據: EPSS 顯示該漏洞近期被利用的可能性處於高位。 強制指令: 被利用機率偏高—請盤點暴露面並優先安排修補。

風險隨態勢動態變化;本站持續評估並同步更新本頁展示內容。

CVE-2016-7055 的 EPSS(利用預測評分)

EPSS 日更估計相對被利用可能性;百分位表示該 CVE 在已評分漏洞中的相對排名(越高表示相對更嚴重)。

# 日期 舊 EPSS 分數 新 EPSS 分數 變化(新 − 舊)
1 2026-06-25 14.34% 14.22% -0.11%
2 2026-06-15 2.69% 14.34% +11.65%
3 2026-05-24 2.69%

完整 EPSS 歷史 (共 30 筆)

CVE-2016-7055 的 CVSS 指標

該 CVE 的 CVSS 指標。

底座分 版本 嚴重度 向量 可利用性 影響 分數來源
5.9 3.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 點擊展開
攻擊向量 (AV:N)
可經網際網路或企業內可路由網段從遠端觸達,攻擊者不必在裝置旁邊。
攻擊複雜度 (AC:H)
即使網路可達,也常要卡時間窗、負載或特定版本組合才打得響。
權限需求 (PR:N)
不必事先登入或提權,匿名工作階段也可能成為跳板。
使用者互動 (UI:N)
不必受害者點連結、放行巨集或安裝軟體,攻擊鏈可自動走完。
作用域 (S:U)
破壞局限在脆弱元件原本的安全權限與信任域之內。
機密性影響 (C:N)
幾乎談不上實質的敏感資料外洩。
完整性影響 (I:N)
對紀錄真實性與不可否認性的破壞可忽略。
可用性影響 (A:H)
可造成長時間中斷、關鍵交易無法完成,或伴隨資料毀損導致難以自癒。
2.2 3.6 [email protected]
2.6 2.0 LOW
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P 點擊展開
存取路徑 (AV:N)
只要路由可達,即可從遠端發動利用。
存取複雜度 (AC:H)
依賴罕見組態或苛刻時機,實戰命中機率低。
認證 (AU:N)
全程無需有效身分。
機密性影響 (C:N)
對機密性無影響。
完整性影響 (I:N)
對完整性無影響。
可用性影響 (A:P)
可用性受到部分損害。
4.9 2.9 [email protected]

CVE-2016-7055 的弱點列舉

CVE-2016-7055 的 OS 追蹤

vendor priority summary link
debian low CVE-2016-7055 low priority: Debian including 1 source packages (openssl), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-7055
gentoo normal CVE-2016-7055: 1 GLSA(s) (201702-07), 1 atom(s) (dev-libs/openssl); latest impact normal. https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=CVE-2016-7055
redhat low https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7055
suse medium CVE-2016-7055 severity moderate: SUSE including 467 source package names (0.9.1:libopenssl1_0_0-1.0.2j-59.1, 0.9.1:openssl-1.0.2j-59.1, …), 729 product×package rows across 94 product lines (Container caasp/v4/default-http-backend, Container caasp/v4/dnsmasq-nanny, … (94 product lines)): Fixed 377, Known Not Affected 195, Known Affected 157. https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7055/
ubuntu low CVE-2016-7055 low priority: Ubuntu including 2 source packages (openssl, openssl098), 10 status rows across 5 suites (precise, trusty, upstream, xenial, yakkety): not-affected 4, DNE 3, released 2, needs-triage 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2016-7055

CVE-2016-7055 的影響軟體 / 設定

廠商 產品 版本 原始 CPE
openssl openssl >= 1.0.2, < 1.0.2k cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
openssl openssl >= 1.1.0, < 1.1.0c cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
nodejs node.js >= 4.0.0, <= 4.1.2 cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*
nodejs node.js >= 4.2.0, < 4.7.3 cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:*:*:*:*:lts:*:*:*
nodejs node.js >= 6.0.0, <= 6.8.1 cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*
nodejs node.js >= 6.9.0, < 6.9.5 cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:*:*:*:*:lts:*:*:*
nodejs node.js >= 7.0.0, < 7.5.0 cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*

CVE-2016-7055 的參考連結

URL 標籤
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html Patch Third Party Advisory
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html Patch Third Party Advisory
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html Patch Third Party Advisory
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94242 Third Party Advisory US Government Resource VDB Entry
http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037261 Third Party Advisory VDB Entry
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2185 Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2186 Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2187 Third Party Advisory
https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbgn03752en_us Third Party Advisory
https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03744en_us Third Party Advisory VDB Entry
https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-17:02.openssl.asc Third Party Advisory
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-07 Third Party Advisory
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20161110.txt Vendor Advisory
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html Patch Third Party Advisory
https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-04 Third Party Advisory
cvelogic Threat Intelligence