聚合 NVD、CVE 及多源情資，深度解析 RCE 等高危風險。系統整合 CVSS 與 EPSS 模型，動態追蹤 Exploit 資源與 PoC 公開狀態，研判可利用性。結合官方修補與修復方案，優化漏洞管理優先級，縮短回應週期，保障資產安全。
| CVE | 描述 | 最高 CVSS | EPSS % | 公開時間 | 更新時間 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2003-5004 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was issued in error. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 無 | 無 | 2025-05-22 | 2025-05-22 |
| CVE-2003-20001 | An issue was discovered on Mitel ICP VoIP 3100 devices. When a remote user attempts to log in via TELNET during the login wait time and an external call comes in, the system incorrectly divulges information about the call and any SMDR records generated by the system. The information provided includes the service type, extension number and other parameters, related to the call activity. | 5.6 | 9.31% | 2025-04-01 | 2026-04-15 |
| CVE-2003-5003 | A vulnerability was found in ISS BlackICE PC Protection. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is the Update Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer | 5.0 | 0.28% | 2022-03-28 | 2024-11-20 |
| CVE-2003-5002 | A vulnerability was found in ISS BlackICE PC Protection. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the component Update Handler which allows cleartext transmission of data. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer | 3.7 | 0.11% | 2022-03-28 | 2024-11-20 |
| CVE-2003-5001 | A vulnerability was found in ISS BlackICE PC Protection and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is the component Cross Site Scripting Detection. The manipulation as part of POST/PUT/DELETE/OPTIONS Request leads to privilege escalation. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer | 5.3 | 0.28% | 2022-03-28 | 2024-11-20 |
| CVE-2003-1602 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | 無 | 0.24% | 2020-11-05 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2003-1601 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | 無 | 0.24% | 2020-11-05 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2003-1600 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | 無 | 0.24% | 2020-11-05 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2003-1605 | curl 7.x before 7.10.7 sends CONNECT proxy credentials to the remote server. | 7.5 | 0.40% | 2018-08-23 | 2024-11-20 |
| CVE-2003-1218 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2003-1217 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2003-0953 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2003-0952 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2003-0923 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2003-0922 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2003-0921 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2003-0920 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2003-0919 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2003-0918 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2003-0917 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |