聚合 NVD、CVE 及多源情資，深度解析 RCE 等高危風險。系統整合 CVSS 與 EPSS 模型，動態追蹤 Exploit 資源與 PoC 公開狀態，研判可利用性。結合官方修補與修復方案，優化漏洞管理優先級，縮短回應週期，保障資產安全。
指派機構（CNA / 來源）：[email protected] 移除此篩選
| CVE | 描述 | 最高 CVSS | EPSS % | 公開時間 | 更新時間 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-28573 | In AndroidManifest.xml, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 10.0 | 0.15% | 2026-06-18 | 2026-06-22 |
| CVE-2026-28615 | In Telecomm, there is a possible way to initiate an unauthorized phone call due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 10.0 | 0.15% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-18 |
| CVE-2026-28587 | In MmsSmsProvider of MmsSmsProvider.java, there is a possible way to retrieve sensitive information due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 10.0 | 0.14% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-28576 | In Contacts Provider, there is a possible way to access the contacts database due to SQL injection. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 10.0 | 0.15% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-28575 | In PackageInstaller.Session#transfer of frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/PackageInstallerSession.java, there is a possible memory exhaustion attack due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 10.0 | 0.15% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0092 | In Package Manager, there is a possible device lock controller bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 10.0 | 0.24% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-18 |
| CVE-2026-0083 | In Nfc::eventCallback() of Nfc.h, there is a possible use after free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 10.0 | 0.12% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-18 |
| CVE-2026-0082 | In tryStartActivity of NfcDispatcher.java, there is a possible automatic special app access permission assignment due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 10.0 | 0.24% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-18 |
| CVE-2026-0081 | In NFC, there is a possible way to spoof an NFC event due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 10.0 | 0.15% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-18 |
| CVE-2026-0071 | In SettingsLib, there is a possible missing permission check due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 10.0 | 0.24% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-18 |
| CVE-2026-0068 | In createSessionInternal of PackageInstallerService.java, there is a possible method to remove a DPC app from a managed device without DO consent due to desync from persistence. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a user can install a malicious app with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | 10.0 | 0.12% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-18 |
| CVE-2026-0064 | In multiple places, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 10.0 | 0.15% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0063 | In setAllowedCarriers of PhoneInterfaceManager.java, there is a possible way to disable carrier restrictions due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 10.0 | 0.24% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-18 |
| CVE-2026-0019 | In SettingsLib, there is a possible way to disable system components due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.13% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-18 |
| CVE-2025-48643 | In multiple locations there is a possible provisioning bypass due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.13% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-18 |
| CVE-2025-48640 | In multiple locations, there is a possible 3rd party passkey entry pairing approval due to a missing permission check. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 8.0 | 0.13% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-18 |
| CVE-2025-48617 | In overrideConfig of CarrierConfigLoader.java, there is a possible way to bypass UID check due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.13% | 2026-06-17 | 2026-06-18 |
| CVE-2026-28580 | In multiple functions, there is a possible desync in persistence due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.07% | 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-28577 | In addWindow of WindowManagerService.java, there is a possible tapjacking issue due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.07% | 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0100 | In Load of LoadedArsc.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.07% | 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-17 |