CVE-2024-5535 | SSL_select_next_proto buffer overread

Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available.

Published: 2024-06-27 Last update: 2026-06-17 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]

Conclusion & alert: CVE-2024-5535 is rated High Risk (67.4/100): CVSS Critical severity, with high exploitation likelihood (EPSS 5.58%, 92th percentile). Core evidence: EPSS ranks this CVE among the most likely to be exploited in the near term. Mandatory action: High exploitation likelihood—assess exposure and prioritize remediation.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2024-5535

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-06-15 6.70% 5.58% -1.12%
2 2026-06-10 6.87% 6.70% -0.17%
3 2026-05-22 6.87%

Full EPSS history (68 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2024-5535

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
9.1 3.1 CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:H)
Serious risk that confidential data gets exposed in a big way.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:H)
Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.
3.9 5.2 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2024-5535

GitHub Security Advisory for CVE-2024-5535

GHSA-4fc7-mvrr-wv2c · Severity: critical — Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported...

OS Trackers for CVE-2024-5535

vendor priority summary link
alpine CVE-2024-5535: 1 source package rows (openssl); 179 state rows across 7 repos (3.17-main, 3.18-main, 3.19-main, 3.20-main, 3.21-main, 3.22-main, edge-main); fixed 11, open 168. https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-5535
debian not yet assigned CVE-2024-5535 not yet assigned priority: Debian including 1 source packages (openssl), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-5535
redhat low https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-5535
suse medium CVE-2024-5535 severity moderate: SUSE including 655 source package names (0.0.17-1.1:libopenssl1_1-1.1.1w-150600.5.6.1, 0.0.17-1.1:libopenssl3-3.1.4-150600.5.10.1, …), 1659 product×package rows across 399 product lines (Container bci/bci-base-fips, Container bci/bci-init, … (399 product lines)): Fixed 1353, Known Affected 213, Known Not Affected 93. https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-5535/
ubuntu low CVE-2024-5535 low priority: Ubuntu including 5 source packages (edk2, nodejs, openssl, openssl-fips, openssl1.0), 49 status rows across 11 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, mantic, noble, oracular, plucky, questing, trusty, upstream, xenial): DNE 13, needs-triage 12, released 10, not-affected 9, ignored 5. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-5535

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2024-5535

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
No affected products in dataset.

References for CVE-2024-5535

URL Tags
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c
https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c
https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240627.txt
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/27/1
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/28/4
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/08/15/1
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00033.html
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00000.html
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240712-0005/
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241025-0006/
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241025-0010/
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-277137.html
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-398330.html
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-769027.html
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-915275.html
cvelogic Threat Intelligence