CVE-2025-69725

An Open Redirect vulnerability in the go-chi/chi >=5.2.2 RedirectSlashes function allows remote attackers to redirect victim users to malicious websites using the legitimate website domain.

Published: 2026-02-19 Last update: 2026-04-15 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]
NVD Status：Deferred，CVE State: published
View at NVD, CVE.org, EUVD

CVE-2025-69725 is rated Low Risk (23.4/100): CVSS Medium severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.22%). Monitor for updates and reassess as exploit intelligence or EPSS changes.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2025-69725

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-06-15 0.03% 0.22% +0.19%
2 2026-02-20 — 0.03% —

Full EPSS history (2 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2025-69725

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
4.7 3.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:R)
A real person has to do something—click, install, enable—otherwise it doesn’t land.
Scope (S:C)
Breaking this can reach past the original component and bite other resources—bigger blast radius.
Confidentiality (C:L)
Some sensitive info could get out, but not a total data dump.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:N)
Service keeps running; no real outage angle.
 2.8 1.4 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2025-69725

OS Trackers for CVE-2025-69725

vendor priority summary link
debian unimportant CVE-2025-69725 unimportant priority: Debian including 1 source packages (golang-github-go-chi-chi), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-69725
redhat medium — https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69725
suse medium CVE-2025-69725 severity moderate: SUSE including 9 source package names (firewalld-prometheus-config, golang-github-prometheus-prometheus, …), 16 product×package rows across 9 product lines (SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0, … (9 product lines)): Known Not Affected 9, Fixed 7. https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69725/
ubuntu medium CVE-2025-69725 medium priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (golang-github-go-chi-chi), 4 status rows across 4 suites (jammy, noble, questing, upstream): needs-triage 4. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-69725

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2025-69725

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
No affected products in dataset.

References for CVE-2025-69725

cvelogic Threat Intelligence