NVD や CVE、ほか複数の脅威フィードを束ね、RCE など高リスクな事象を深く追える一覧です。CVSS と EPSS を組み合わせ、Exploit 参照や PoC の有無から悪用しやすさを追跡します。ベンダー修正や緩和策の文脈とあわせて優先度を決め、対応サイクルを短く保ちつつ重要資産を守る支援をします。
Assigner（CNA／発行元）：[email protected] この条件を外す
| CVE | 説明 | CVSS 最大値 | EPSS（%） | 公開 | 更新 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2005-2408 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2006-0560 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2009-3034 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3720 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3721 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3722 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3723 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3724 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3725 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3726 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3727 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3728 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-3476 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-3480 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2012-3583 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2012-6533 | Buffer overflow in pgpwded.sys in Symantec PGP Desktop 10.x and Encryption Desktop 10.3.0 before MP1 on Windows XP and Server 2003 allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application. | 4.4 | 0.10% | 2013-02-18 | 2026-04-29 |
| CVE-2013-1608 | Directory traversal vulnerability in the Management Console on the Symantec NetBackup (NBU) appliance 2.0.x allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors. | 6.7 | 0.18% | 2013-03-26 | 2026-04-29 |
| CVE-2013-1609 | Multiple unquoted Windows search path vulnerabilities in the (1) File Collector and (2) File PlaceHolder services in Symantec Enterprise Vault (EV) for File System Archiving before 9.0.4 and 10.x before 10.0.1 allow local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse program. | 6.8 | 0.27% | 2013-03-26 | 2026-04-29 |
| CVE-2013-1610 | Unquoted Windows search path vulnerability in RDDService in Symantec PGP Desktop 10.0.x through 10.2.x and Symantec Encryption Desktop 10.3.0 before MP3 allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse application in the %SYSTEMDRIVE% top-level directory. | 6.8 | 0.04% | 2013-08-05 | 2026-04-29 |
| CVE-2013-1611 | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in administrative-interface pages in the management console in Symantec Brightmail Gateway 9.5.x allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | 3.5 | 0.28% | 2013-05-09 | 2026-04-29 |