聚合 NVD、CVE 及多源情报，深度解析 RCE 等高危风险。系统集成 CVSS 与 EPSS 模型，动态追踪 Exploit 资源与 PoC 公开状态，研判可利用性。结合官方补丁与修复方案，优化漏洞管理优先级，缩短响应周期，保障资产安全。
分配机构（CNA / 来源）：[email protected] 移除此筛选
| CVE | 描述 | 最高 CVSS | EPSS % | 公开时间 | 更新时间 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2005-2408 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2006-0560 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2009-3034 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3720 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3721 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3722 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3723 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3724 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3725 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3726 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3727 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-3728 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-3476 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-3480 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2012-3583 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2012-6533 | Buffer overflow in pgpwded.sys in Symantec PGP Desktop 10.x and Encryption Desktop 10.3.0 before MP1 on Windows XP and Server 2003 allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application. | 4.4 | 0.62% | 2013-02-18 | 2026-04-29 |
| CVE-2013-1608 | Directory traversal vulnerability in the Management Console on the Symantec NetBackup (NBU) appliance 2.0.x allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors. | 6.7 | 1.25% | 2013-03-26 | 2026-04-29 |
| CVE-2013-1609 | Multiple unquoted Windows search path vulnerabilities in the (1) File Collector and (2) File PlaceHolder services in Symantec Enterprise Vault (EV) for File System Archiving before 9.0.4 and 10.x before 10.0.1 allow local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse program. | 6.8 | 0.41% | 2013-03-26 | 2026-04-29 |
| CVE-2013-1610 | Unquoted Windows search path vulnerability in RDDService in Symantec PGP Desktop 10.0.x through 10.2.x and Symantec Encryption Desktop 10.3.0 before MP3 allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse application in the %SYSTEMDRIVE% top-level directory. | 6.8 | 0.30% | 2013-08-05 | 2026-04-29 |
| CVE-2013-1611 | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in administrative-interface pages in the management console in Symantec Brightmail Gateway 9.5.x allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | 3.5 | 0.84% | 2013-05-09 | 2026-04-29 |