NVD や CVE、ほか複数の脅威フィードを束ね、RCE など高リスクな事象を深く追える一覧です。CVSS と EPSS を組み合わせ、Exploit 参照や PoC の有無から悪用しやすさを追跡します。ベンダー修正や緩和策の文脈とあわせて優先度を決め、対応サイクルを短く保ちつつ重要資産を守る支援をします。
Assigner（CNA／発行元）：[email protected] この条件を外す
| CVE | 説明 | CVSS 最大値 | EPSS（%） | 公開 | 更新 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-8208 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8209 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8210 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8211 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-0845 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-2438 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-2547, CVE-2016-2548. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-2547 and CVE-2016-2548. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-2547 and/or CVE-2016-2548 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2016-05-09 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-2447 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-4477. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-4477. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-4477 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2016-05-09 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-2455 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3776 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3777 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3778 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3779 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3780 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3781 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3782 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3783 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3784 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3785 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3786 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3787 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |