NVD や CVE、ほか複数の脅威フィードを束ね、RCE など高リスクな事象を深く追える一覧です。CVSS と EPSS を組み合わせ、Exploit 参照や PoC の有無から悪用しやすさを追跡します。ベンダー修正や緩和策の文脈とあわせて優先度を決め、対応サイクルを短く保ちつつ重要資産を守る支援をします。
Assigner（CNA／発行元）：[email protected] この条件を外す
| CVE | 説明 | CVSS 最大値 | EPSS（%） | 公開 | 更新 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-3788 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3789 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3790 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3791 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3794 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-3814. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-3814. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-3814 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2016-07-08 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3817 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-3919 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-5195. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-5195. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-5195 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2016-11-25 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-8489 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10242. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-10242. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10242 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 該当なし | 0.24% | 2018-12-10 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2017-0605 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-12 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2019-2224 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-15140. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2019-15140. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-15140 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 該当なし | 0.24% | 2019-12-06 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2019-9374 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.29% | 2019-09-27 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2019-9457 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-14634. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2018-14634. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-14634 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 該当なし | 0.24% | 2019-09-06 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2019-9460 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. It was intended to be published earlier but will be made public later instead. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.24% | 2019-09-27 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2019-9466 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-9503. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2019-9503. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-9503 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 該当なし | 0.24% | 2019-11-13 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2020-0237 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.24% | 2021-01-27 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2020-0255 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 該当なし | 0.24% | 2020-08-14 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2020-0435 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-14615. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2018-14615. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-14615 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 該当なし | 0.24% | 2020-09-17 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2020-0487 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.24% | 2020-12-15 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2021-0384 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.24% | 2021-03-10 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2021-39617 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | 該当なし | 0.04% | 2022-12-13 | 2023-11-06 |