NVD や CVE、ほか複数の脅威フィードを束ね、RCE など高リスクな事象を深く追える一覧です。CVSS と EPSS を組み合わせ、Exploit 参照や PoC の有無から悪用しやすさを追跡します。ベンダー修正や緩和策の文脈とあわせて優先度を決め、対応サイクルを短く保ちつつ重要資産を守る支援をします。
Assigner（CNA／発行元）：[email protected] この条件を外す
| CVE | 説明 | CVSS 最大値 | EPSS（%） | 公開 | 更新 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-27655 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-9587. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-9587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-9587 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 該当なし | 0.06% | 2023-03-23 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2023-26934 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-9587. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-9587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-9587 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 該当なし | 0.04% | 2023-04-26 | 2026-02-25 |
| CVE-2023-26935 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-9587. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-9587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-9587 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 該当なし | 0.06% | 2023-04-26 | 2026-02-25 |
| CVE-2023-26936 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-9587. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-9587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-9587 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 該当なし | 0.06% | 2023-04-26 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2023-26937 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-9587. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-9587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-9587 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 該当なし | 0.06% | 2023-04-26 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2023-26938 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-9587. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-9587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-9587 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 該当なし | 0.06% | 2023-04-26 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2023-31554 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-2663. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2023-2663. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2023-2663 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 該当なし | 0.06% | 2023-05-10 | 2026-02-25 |
| CVE-2023-31557 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-2664. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2023-2664. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2023-2664 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 該当なし | 0.06% | 2023-05-10 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2023-2662 | In Xpdf 4.04 (and earlier), a bad color space object in the input PDF file can cause a divide-by-zero. | 2.9 | 0.28% | 2023-05-11 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2023-2663 | In Xpdf 4.04 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in the page label tree leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow. | 2.9 | 0.48% | 2023-05-11 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2023-2664 | In Xpdf 4.04 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in the embedded file tree leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow. | 2.9 | 0.30% | 2023-05-11 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2023-3044 | An excessively large PDF page size (found in fuzz testing, unlikely in normal PDF files) can result in a divide-by-zero in Xpdf's text extraction code. This is related to CVE-2022-30524, but the problem here is caused by a very large page size, rather than by a very large character coordinate. | 3.3 | 0.35% | 2023-06-02 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2023-3436 | Xpdf 4.04 will deadlock on a PDF object stream whose "Length" field is itself in another object stream. | 3.3 | 0.17% | 2023-06-27 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2024-2971 | Out-of-bounds array write in Xpdf 4.05 and earlier, triggered by negative object number in indirect reference in the input PDF file. | 2.9 | 0.18% | 2024-03-26 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2024-3247 | In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in an object stream leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow. | 2.9 | 0.29% | 2024-04-02 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2024-3248 | In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in the attachments leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow. | 2.9 | 0.29% | 2024-04-02 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2024-3900 | Out-of-bounds array write in Xpdf 4.05 and earlier, triggered by long Unicode sequence in ActualText. | 2.9 | 0.18% | 2024-04-17 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2024-4141 | Out-of-bounds array write in Xpdf 4.05 and earlier, triggered by an invalid character code in a Type 1 font. The root problem was a bounds check that was being optimized away by modern compilers. | 2.9 | 0.18% | 2024-04-24 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2024-4568 | In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in the PDF resources leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow. | 2.9 | 0.22% | 2024-05-06 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2024-4976 | Out-of-bounds array write in Xpdf 4.05 and earlier, due to missing object type check in AcroForm field reference. | 2.1 | 0.17% | 2024-05-15 | 2026-06-17 |