聚合 NVD、CVE 及多源情报，深度解析 RCE 等高危风险。系统集成 CVSS 与 EPSS 模型，动态追踪 Exploit 资源与 PoC 公开状态，研判可利用性。结合官方补丁与修复方案，优化漏洞管理优先级，缩短响应周期，保障资产安全。
分配机构（CNA / 来源）：[email protected] 移除此筛选
| CVE | 描述 | 最高 CVSS | EPSS % | 公开时间 | 更新时间 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-27655 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-9587. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-9587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-9587 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 无 | 0.06% | 2023-03-23 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2023-26934 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-9587. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-9587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-9587 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 无 | 0.04% | 2023-04-26 | 2026-02-25 |
| CVE-2023-26935 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-9587. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-9587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-9587 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 无 | 0.06% | 2023-04-26 | 2026-02-25 |
| CVE-2023-26936 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-9587. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-9587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-9587 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 无 | 0.06% | 2023-04-26 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2023-26937 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-9587. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-9587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-9587 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 无 | 0.06% | 2023-04-26 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2023-26938 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-9587. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-9587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-9587 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 无 | 0.06% | 2023-04-26 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2023-31554 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-2663. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2023-2663. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2023-2663 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 无 | 0.06% | 2023-05-10 | 2026-02-25 |
| CVE-2023-31557 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-2664. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2023-2664. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2023-2664 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | 无 | 0.06% | 2023-05-10 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2023-2662 | In Xpdf 4.04 (and earlier), a bad color space object in the input PDF file can cause a divide-by-zero. | 2.9 | 0.28% | 2023-05-11 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2023-2663 | In Xpdf 4.04 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in the page label tree leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow. | 2.9 | 0.48% | 2023-05-11 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2023-2664 | In Xpdf 4.04 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in the embedded file tree leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow. | 2.9 | 0.30% | 2023-05-11 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2023-3044 | An excessively large PDF page size (found in fuzz testing, unlikely in normal PDF files) can result in a divide-by-zero in Xpdf's text extraction code. This is related to CVE-2022-30524, but the problem here is caused by a very large page size, rather than by a very large character coordinate. | 3.3 | 0.35% | 2023-06-02 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2023-3436 | Xpdf 4.04 will deadlock on a PDF object stream whose "Length" field is itself in another object stream. | 3.3 | 0.17% | 2023-06-27 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2024-2971 | Out-of-bounds array write in Xpdf 4.05 and earlier, triggered by negative object number in indirect reference in the input PDF file. | 2.9 | 0.18% | 2024-03-26 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2024-3247 | In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in an object stream leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow. | 2.9 | 0.29% | 2024-04-02 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2024-3248 | In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in the attachments leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow. | 2.9 | 0.29% | 2024-04-02 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2024-3900 | Out-of-bounds array write in Xpdf 4.05 and earlier, triggered by long Unicode sequence in ActualText. | 2.9 | 0.18% | 2024-04-17 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2024-4141 | Out-of-bounds array write in Xpdf 4.05 and earlier, triggered by an invalid character code in a Type 1 font. The root problem was a bounds check that was being optimized away by modern compilers. | 2.9 | 0.18% | 2024-04-24 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2024-4568 | In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in the PDF resources leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow. | 2.9 | 0.22% | 2024-05-06 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2024-4976 | Out-of-bounds array write in Xpdf 4.05 and earlier, due to missing object type check in AcroForm field reference. | 2.1 | 0.17% | 2024-05-15 | 2026-06-17 |