Aggregating NVD, CVE, and multi-source threat feeds, this list provides deep analysis of high-risk threats such as RCE. By integrating CVSS and EPSS models, the system dynamically tracks Exp (Exploit) resources and PoC availability to accurately assess Exploitability. Combined with official Patches and remediation strategies, it helps prioritize Vulnerability Management workflows, significantly shortening response cycles and securing your critical assets.
Assigner (CNA / source)：[email protected] Remove this filter
| CVE | Description | Max CVSS | EPSS % | Published | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-1653 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2014. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-3583 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2011-3480 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2011-3476 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3728 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3727 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3726 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3725 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3724 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3723 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3722 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3721 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3720 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2009-3034 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-0560 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2005-2408 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2022-25623 | The Symantec Management Agent is susceptible to a privilege escalation vulnerability. A low privilege local account can be elevated to the SYSTEM level through registry manipulations. | 7.8 | 0.27% | 2022-03-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2017-15525 | Prior to SEE v11.1.3MP1, Symantec Endpoint Encryption can be susceptible to a denial of service (DoS) attack, which is a type of attack whereby the perpetrator attempts to make a particular machine or network resource unavailable to its intended users by temporarily or indefinitely disrupting services of a specific host within a network. | 4.5 | 0.27% | 2017-11-13 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2023-23957 | An authenticated user can see and modify the value for ‘next’ query parameter in Symantec Identity Portal 14.4 | 5.4 | 0.28% | 2023-09-19 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2017-13683 | In Symantec Endpoint Encryption before SEE 11.1.3HF3, a kernel memory leak is a type of resource leak that can occur when a computer program incorrectly manages memory allocations in such a way that memory which is no longer needed is not released. In object-oriented programming, a memory leak may happen when an object is stored in memory but cannot be accessed by the running code. | 5.7 | 0.28% | 2017-10-23 | 2026-06-16 |