聚合 NVD、CVE 及多源情資，深度解析 RCE 等高危風險。系統整合 CVSS 與 EPSS 模型，動態追蹤 Exploit 資源與 PoC 公開狀態，研判可利用性。結合官方修補與修復方案，優化漏洞管理優先級，縮短回應週期，保障資產安全。
指派機構（CNA / 來源）：[email protected] 移除此篩選
| CVE | 描述 | 最高 CVSS | EPSS % | 公開時間 | 更新時間 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-1653 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2014. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-3583 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2011-3480 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2011-3476 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3728 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3727 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3726 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3725 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3724 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3723 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3722 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3721 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2010-3720 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2009-3034 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-0560 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2005-2408 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | 無 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2022-25623 | The Symantec Management Agent is susceptible to a privilege escalation vulnerability. A low privilege local account can be elevated to the SYSTEM level through registry manipulations. | 7.8 | 0.27% | 2022-03-04 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2017-15525 | Prior to SEE v11.1.3MP1, Symantec Endpoint Encryption can be susceptible to a denial of service (DoS) attack, which is a type of attack whereby the perpetrator attempts to make a particular machine or network resource unavailable to its intended users by temporarily or indefinitely disrupting services of a specific host within a network. | 4.5 | 0.27% | 2017-11-13 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2023-23957 | An authenticated user can see and modify the value for ‘next’ query parameter in Symantec Identity Portal 14.4 | 5.4 | 0.28% | 2023-09-19 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2017-13683 | In Symantec Endpoint Encryption before SEE 11.1.3HF3, a kernel memory leak is a type of resource leak that can occur when a computer program incorrectly manages memory allocations in such a way that memory which is no longer needed is not released. In object-oriented programming, a memory leak may happen when an object is stored in memory but cannot be accessed by the running code. | 5.7 | 0.28% | 2017-10-23 | 2026-06-16 |