聚合 NVD、CVE 及多源情报，深度解析 RCE 等高危风险。系统集成 CVSS 与 EPSS 模型，动态追踪 Exploit 资源与 PoC 公开状态，研判可利用性。结合官方补丁与修复方案，优化漏洞管理优先级，缩短响应周期，保障资产安全。
分配机构（CNA / 来源）：[email protected] 移除此筛选
| CVE | 描述 | 最高 CVSS | EPSS % | 公开时间 | 更新时间 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-9233 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2014. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8155 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8802 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8904 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8905 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8906 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8907 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8908 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8909 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8910 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8911 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8912 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2015-8913 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-9092 | The Symantec Content Analysis (CA) 1.3, 2.x prior to 2.2.1.1, and Mail Threat Defense (MTD) 1.1 management consoles are susceptible to a cross-site request forging (CSRF) vulnerability. A remote attacker can use phishing or other social engineering techniques to access the management console with the privileges of an authenticated administrator user. | 8.8 | 0.57% | 2017-05-11 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2016-9095 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-9096 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-9097 | The Symantec Advanced Secure Gateway (ASG) 6.6 prior to 6.6.5.8, ProxySG 6.5 prior 6.5.10.6, ProxySG 6.6 prior to 6.6.5.8, and ProxySG 6.7 prior to 6.7.1.2 management consoles do not, under certain circumstances, correctly authorize administrator users. A malicious administrator with read-only access can exploit this vulnerability to access management console functionality that requires read-write access privileges. | 7.2 | 2.35% | 2017-05-11 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2016-9098 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | 无 | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2016-9099 | Symantec Advanced Secure Gateway (ASG) 6.6, ASG 6.7 prior to 6.7.2.1, ProxySG 6.5 prior to 6.5.10.6, ProxySG 6.6, and ProxySG 6.7 prior to 6.7.2.1 are susceptible to an open redirection vulnerability. A remote attacker can use a crafted management console URL in a phishing attack to redirect the target user to a malicious web site. | 6.1 | 1.83% | 2017-05-11 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2016-9100 | Symantec Advanced Secure Gateway (ASG) 6.6 prior to 6.6.5.13, ASG 6.7 prior to 6.7.3.1, ProxySG 6.5 prior to 6.5.10.6, ProxySG 6.6 prior to 6.6.5.13, and ProxySG 6.7 prior to 6.7.3.1 are susceptible to an information disclosure vulnerability. An attacker with local access to the client host of an authenticated administrator user can, under certain circumstances, obtain sensitive authentication credential information. | 7.8 | 0.43% | 2017-05-11 | 2026-06-16 |